By Primary Research Group

Show description

Read Online or Download Academic Library Cataloging Practices Benchmarks PDF

Similar library & information science books

Authors in the Kitchen: Recipes, Stories, and More by Sharron L. McElmeel PDF

Step into the kitchen and fire up a batch of storybook treats with literary recipes in keeping with the books and lives of fifty of your favourite kid's authors and illustrators, together with Eric Carle, Mary Casanova, Keiko Kasza, Steven Kellogg, Yuyi Morales, Janet Stevens, and Jane Yolen and forty others. Whip up a heavenly coconut cream cake loved in Jacqueline Briggs Martin's fresh tale, On Sand Island; have fun with the highly spiced pumpkin pie encouraged by way of Toni Buzzeo's Sea Chest.

Less Is More: A Practical Guide to Weeding School Library by Donna J. Baumbach, Linda L Miller PDF

Very important. Weeding could be a daunting problem, particularly with no advice or support. To make weeding a part of a library s ongoing tactics, it s most sensible to do it in doable doses. Now tuition and kids s librarians national can acquire the advantage of Florida s renowned Weed of the Month software. Updating a few of that application s earliest ideas, this new entire weeding advisor from an identical specialists, is sort of a pleasant mentor able to help librarians on one among their extra exhausting initiatives.

Download e-book for kindle: Academic Librarianship by Design by Steven Bell, John Shank

Switch is unfolding at a livid velocity for tutorial librarians, the place even predictions of obsolescence abound. This new imaginative and prescient for designing the way forward for educational libraries allows librarians to turn into critical companions within the university instructing exercise via integrating themselves into the educational approach.

The fortuitous teacher : a guide to successful one-shot - download pdf or read online

The Fortuitous instructor: A consultant to winning One-Shot Library guide discusses how librarians became unintentional academics within the educational collage atmosphere. It covers how (if in any respect) librarians are ready by way of MILS courses to coach, compares standard features of academics as opposed to librarians, and provides strategies on easy methods to examine potent educating abilities at the activity.

Extra resources for Academic Library Cataloging Practices Benchmarks

Sample text

4% said it was good. Community colleges seem to be having a particularly difficult time in finding pertinent training events. 3% described it as good. 7% considered the situation good. 5% of participants. More than 61% of survey participants said that in general the handouts that they received in training sessions were excellent or good.

132: ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: REGION OR LOCATION OF TRAINING, BROKEN OUT BY TYPE OF COLLEGE .................................................... 133: ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: COMPREHENSIVE LIST OF TRAINING EVENTS ................................................................................... 135: ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OVERALL STATE OF CURRENT TRAINING AND CONTINUING EDUCATION IN CATALOGING AND METADATA: COMPREHENSIVE LIST OF TRAINING EVENTS, BROKEN OUT BY FTE ATTENDANCE..............

No public college characterized it as excellent, though 20% characterized it as good. Half of all research universities characterized the situation as poor and none characterized it as excellent. 4% said it was good. Community colleges seem to be having a particularly difficult time in finding pertinent training events. 3% described it as good. 7% considered the situation good. 5% of participants. More than 61% of survey participants said that in general the handouts that they received in training sessions were excellent or good.

Download PDF sample

Academic Library Cataloging Practices Benchmarks by Primary Research Group


by Donald
4.1

Rated 4.79 of 5 – based on 49 votes